CAPIC REVIEW

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business Management

ISSN 0718-4662

logo revista Capic Review
Vol. 18 (2020): CAPIC REVIEW
Investigation

Basis of generated economic value distribution for business sustainability

Karime Chahuan
Universidad de Valparaíso
Jonathan Vásquez Verdugo
Universidad de Valparaíso
Bio
Portada Volumen 18 Año 2020
Categories

Published 2020-12-15

Keywords

  • assembled clustering,
  • economic value,
  • GRI,
  • sustainnability

How to Cite

Chahuan, K., & Vásquez Verdugo, J. (2020). Basis of generated economic value distribution for business sustainability. CAPIC REVIEW, 18, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35928/cr.vol18.2020.102

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been discussed over the last four decades. Global social demands require organizations to report their environmental and social impact, which can be done based on the standards of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). These establish that economic value can be distributed in at least 5 aspects: Operational Costs, Salary and Employee Benefits, Payments to Suppliers, Payments to Government, and Investments in the Community. Given this, from a stakeholder’s perspective, inquiries arise about concentration in the distributed value. After an exploratory qualitative analysis followed by an Ensembled Clustering algorithm implementation, 3 and 5 groups were identified in 2018 and 2019 respectively from the companies with greater presences in the stock market. Each group has concentrations in 4 of the 5 aspects previously listed by the GRI. According to the results, the identification of these groups would allow investors to know the spotlights on the distributed value generation so using this as inputs when investments are made. Additionally, according to the results, the characteristics related to the Investments in the Community was identified as not considered by any groups, opening a gap of differentiating aspect and improvement by companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alqurashi, T. & Wang, W. (2019). Clustering ensemble method. International Journal of Machine Learning Cybernetics, 10(6), 1227-1246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0807-8.
  2. ATLAS.ti (2016). Software ATLAS.ti, Análisis cualitativo de datos.
  3. Arora, P. & Varshney, S. (2016). Analysis of k-means and k-medoids algorithm for big data. Procedia Computer Science, 78, 507-512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.095
  4. Bezdek, J. C., Ehrlich, R., & Full, W. (1984). FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 10(2-3), 191-203.
  5. Bolsa de Santiago (2020). SP IPSA. Disponible en: https://www.bolsadesantiago.com/detalle_indice/SP%20IPSA. Extraído el 20 de Marzo de 2020.
  6. Chiu, D.S., & Talhouk, A. (2018). DiceR: An R package for class discovery using an ensemble driven approach. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1996-y
  7. Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  8. diceR package | R Documentation. (2019). Retrieved June 26, 2020, from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/diceR/versions/0.6.0
  9. Fred, A.L., & Jain, A.K. (2005). Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 27(6), 835-850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2005.113
  10. GRI (2016). Gri 201: Desempeño Económico 2016. Disponible en: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-translations/gri-standards-spanish-translations-download-center/ Extraído el 03 de Abril de 2020.
  11. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Astels, S. (2017). Hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. Journal of Open Source Software, 2(11), 205.
  12. Moneva, J.M, Archel, P. Y Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum. 30(2). 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001
  13. Provost, F. & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science for Business: What you need to know about data mining and data-analytic thinking. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
  14. Safiri, M. & Areeb, A. (2020): A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective, Accounting Forum, DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759
  15. Șenbabaoğlu, Y., Michailidis, G., & Li, J.Z. (2014). Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery. Scientific reports, 4(1), 1-13.
  16. Smit, A. & Bierman, E. (2017). An evaluation of the reporting on ethics and integrity of selected listed motor vehicle companies. African Journal of Business Ethics. Vol 11 (1) 82- 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/11-1-152
  17. Yang, F.C. (2017). Integrating corporate social responsibility and profitability into best practice selection: the case of large Taiwanese firms. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), 1493-1512. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0348-8

CHILEAN UNIVERSITIES

FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES

Code under GNU license: OJS PKP