CAPIC REVIEW

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business Management

ISSN 0718-4662

logo revista Capic Review
Vol. 14 (2016): CAPIC REVIEW
Investigation

University social responsibility models and the main challenges for implementation in business schools

Javiera N. Müller Núñez
Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Santo Tomás
Freddy Coronado Martínez
Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile
Categories

Published 2016-12-10

Keywords

  • Business Schools,
  • Models,
  • University Social Responsibility,
  • University Sustainability

How to Cite

Müller Núñez, J. N. ., & Coronado Martínez, F. . (2016). University social responsibility models and the main challenges for implementation in business schools. CAPIC REVIEW, 14, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.35928/cr.vol14.2016.36

Abstract

Social responsibility (SR) has become a global phenomenon due to multiple events that transgress the boundaries of acceptable social and respectful coexistence with sustainable development, associated with unethical performance. Therefore, it is important that the (SR) is rooted in the beliefs of the future leaders of business and society. Universities can not be abstracted from this need in a context that shows us again and again, that their graduates have to take the lead and generate changes needed so sustainability will not only be a wish, but also a reality.

The objective of this work is to study models of University Social Responsibility (USR) and to present the challenges for implementation, mainly in business schools. To meet this goal, we both introduce the main existing models of USR and relate to each other, to determine similarities or differences.

By analyzing the models and contrasting them with the Chilean reality, we present the challenges for the implementation of the USR in higher education institutions. Finally, some examples of initiatives specifically designed for business schools are presented.

Among the results, we can highlight the recognition of the need for the USR is a priority at the strategic level, and as a result, the need to introduce an office of USR that has resources to implement such initiatives. There is also a need for introducing USR periodic reports by responsibility centers for ensuring transparency, comparability, monitoring and compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. AUSJAL, (2009). “Políticas y sistema de autoevaluación y gestión de la responsabilidad social universitaria en AUSJAL”. AUSJAL, Argentina.

2. Kaivola, T., & Rohweder, L, (2007). “Towards Sustainable Development in Higher Education–Reflections”. Publications of the Ministry of Education. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.

3. ONU, (2015). “Objetivos del desarrollo sostenible”. Extraído el 13 de Noviembre 2015 desde: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible/

4. UNESCO, (1998). Declaración Mundial Sobre la Educación Superior en el siglo XXI: Visión y Acción.

5. Universidad Construye-País, (2002). “Hacia las sociedades del conocimiento, informe mundial. Observando la Responsabilidad Social Universitaria”, Documento de Trabajo, Santiago de Chile.

6. Universidad Construye-País, (2006). “Responsabilidad Social Universitaria; Una manera de ser Universidad, Teoría y práctica de la experiencia Chilena”, Documento de Trabajo, Santiago de Chile.

7. Vallaeys, F., (2006). “Responsabilidad social Universitaria: Hacia un concepto maduro para su gestión institucional”. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú.

8. Vallaeys, F., (2009). “Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Manual de Primeros Pasos” BID / McGrawHill.

9. Vallaeys, F., (2013). La Responsabilidad Social Universitaria: ¿Cómo entenderla para quererla y practicarla? Revista Servicio Comunitario.

CHILEAN UNIVERSITIES

FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES

Code under GNU license: OJS PKP